A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of treatment of atlantoaxial instability with C1 posterior arches >4 mm by comparing C1 pedicle with lateral mass screws fixation.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND C1 posterior arch screw placement is one of the most effective treatments for atlantoaxial instability (AAI), which can be performed by either pedicle or lateral mass screw fixation. This study attempted to compare the feasibility and clinical outcomes of C1 pedicle with lateral mass screw fixations for treatment of AAI with C1 posterior arches >4 mm. METHODS A total of 140 patients with AAI (C1 posterior arches measuring >4 mm) was enrolled in this single-center, randomized, double-blind trial. The subjects were randomly assigned into two treatments: C1 pedicle (group A) or lateral mass (group B) screw fixation. The patients, independent evaluating physicians and radiologists were blinded throughout the entire study. Patients were assessed before operation and in a series of follow-ups at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years post-surgery. The operation time, volume of blood loss, intraoperative complications, bone fusion rates, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were monitored. RESULTS All 140 patients showed overall improvements in clinical symptoms after surgery. The mean follow-up time was 24.5 ± 13.0 months. In both groups, the mean JOA scores improved significantly at the time of final follow-up as compared to prior surgery (group A: 7.1 ± 1.4 vs 13.7 ± 1.9; group B:7.3 ± 1.8 vs 13.1 ± 1.4; improvement rates: 87.2% (group A) and 86.5% (group B)). The VAS scores also decreased significantly in both groups at the time of final follow-up as compared to prior surgery (group A: 6.0 ± 1.3 vs 1.7 ± 0.8, and group B: 5.7 ± 1.1 vs 2.1 ± 1.2). Bone fusion was achieved within 12 months postoperatively in the patients from both groups. The operation time was significantly shorter and volume of blood loss was significantly less in the patients from group A as compared to group B (p < 0.01). Furthermore, thirteen patients had burst bleeding from the C1-2 venous plexus and nine patients had immediate pain and numbness in the occipitocervical region due to C2 nerve roots irritation during lateral mass screw replacement, which were not observed in the patients with C1 pedicle screw insertion. No complications such as screw loosening, shifting, breakage, or AAI were observed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS C1 pedicle screw fixation is less invasive and simpler, and has fewer complications. It renders better clinical outcomes than lateral mass screw fixation for treatment of AAI. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ChiCTR-IOR-15006748 .
منابع مشابه
Posterior atlantal lateral mass fixation technique with polyaxial screw and rod fixation system.
OBJECTIVE Atlantoaxial instability may result from various pathologic conditions and operative treatment may be required to correct the deformity, provide stability and prevent neurological deficits. We presented our clinic's experience using C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation for C1 and C2 instability for various reasons. METHODS AND MATERIAL Four patients with atlantoaxial i...
متن کاملAtlantoaxial fixation: overview of all techniques.
Over the past century, steady advances have been made in fixating an unstable atlantoaxial complex. Current options for fixation of the atlantoaxial complex include posterior clamps, posterior wiring techniques, C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation, posterior C1 lateral mass screw with C2 pars or pedicle screw fixation, and anterior transoral C1 lateral mass to C2 vertebral body fixation.
متن کاملA New Technique for the Surgical Treatment of Atlantoaxial Instability: C1 Lateral Mass and C2-3 Transfacet Screwing.
AIM Atlantoaxial instability is a special entity that may be caused by many disorders such as trauma, tumor, arthritis, congenital malformation and infection. Atlantoaxial fixation is needed to provide stability, prevent neurological deficits and correct deformity. The objective of this study is to introduce an alternative technique for the treatment of atlantoaxial instability in patients who ...
متن کاملPosterior Atalntoaxial Fusion with C1 Lateral Mass Screw and C2 Pedicle Screw Supplemented with Miniplate Fixation for Interlaminar Fusion : A Preliminary Report
OBJECTIVE To investigate the feasibility of C1 lateral mass screw and C2 pedicle screw with polyaxial screw and rod system supplemented with miniplate for interlaminar fusion to treat various atlantoaxial instabilities. METHODS After posterior atlantoaxial fixation with lateral mass screw in the atlas and pedicle screw in the axis, we used 2 miniplates to fixate interlaminar iliac bone graft ...
متن کاملProspective, Self-controlled, Comparative Study of Transposterior Arch Lateral Mass Screw Fixation and Lateral Mass Screw Fixation of the Atlas in the Treatment of Atlantoaxial Instability.
STUDY DESIGN A prospective self-controlled study. OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to compare the application and clinical outcomes of transposterior arch lateral mass screw and lateral mass screw fixation of the atlas in the treatment of atlantoaxial instability. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Atlas posterior screw fixation techniques comprise transposterior arch lateral mass screw f...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- BMC musculoskeletal disorders
دوره 17 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016